TV News London 2005_07_07

On the News tonight they mentioned the Inquest about London 7/7.

I find the mention of the whole affair annoying, as I had to wait Six years to do a trip with a friend, as his mother was scared of Terrorism. Each Year Costs were going up and my Friend had to go by HST, that Meant London. I was waiting for that fateful day, I was in London on that day. Two years after that I was showing my friends the route I had been forced to take as a result of the Bombs. The bit that annoys me is that having to wait for it to happen in the first place, - this is part of the reason Why I have ended up turning into an Extremist with a Difference. The Trip did take place eventually, it left me feeling because I had mad that threat to his mother, If we do not go Around London, I will not be able to see him travel independently as my Railcard runs out this year.

For those of us who have Lost Loved ones I am happy to remember them, but for those that are Left, Let us just get on with life.

If we had got our backsides in gear, Al–Qaeda would be doing stuff in London, when we would be out of London, London was the Cheapest place to go and Guarantee getting a HST.

Also if anything went wrong in London the Consequences would not be as bad as I in London a mistake was Easily Rectified, where as in the west it was not going to be as easily rectifiable.

Al–Qaeda is the latest Organisation to make Bombs fake.

Also if we are really Serious about preventing Terrorism Should Lost Items not be found within hours, of the item being reported lost. and Lost Property Offices open

·The Same times as Left Luggage where Facilities Exist

·The Other Place, Normal Business Hours + Peak Travelling Periods Mondays to Fridays, Shopping Hours and Saturdays and Sundays

Why is it that the only Train Companies that have found a bag that I have lost are

1. East Midland Trains

2. Northern Rail

3. Trans Pennine Express

Opening Hours were variable

1. East Midland Trains, Leicester – 0400 to 0200 – GREAT ‘Most Mathemitical’ Status Granted

2. Northern Rail, Bolton 1000 to 1300 – MOST UNACCEPTABLE Giving the Terrorists an Upper Edge

3. Trans Pennine Express Manchester Airport, Opening Hours Not Known, BUT ITEM WAS FOUND – FREE TRAVEL WAS Granted to me to collect. ‘Most Mathemitical’ Status Granted

In fact Heritage Railways are better at Finding and returning Lost Luggage then Most National Network Operators

As Provocative as these posters might be, unfortunately they are my Genuine (Non Religious) Beliefs

I am looking to focus my beliefs on a more Love Your Neighbour Stream, but would need Muslims and Christians to put aside differences, After 7/7 there were multi faith Services, Focus on Love God and Love Neighbour and Agree to Disagree on the rest.

Radical Thinkers - Threat 2 Our Trrops

Hi Person Reading This Artical

Firstly, Some of these views might be a bit extreme but there are my true beliefs and feelings. As I struggle with Telling Lies I have not told any and would say exactly what is in this artical to the Police or MI5 if it was needed. I am sorry if they offend, please make sure you read everything properly, I have done my best to explain things properly with leaving as little chance to cause offence as possible. You might think that this email is the birth of Extreme Literalism, if so - Let it be

A couple of Compact Discs have been sent to the Times as well as the Artical. It is a project I started showing the Bus Services From Olney near Milton Keynes and what a mess has been made of them. The Poor Planning and implementing of the timetable has contributed to my Extremism.

Recently the Times had on the front page news ‘Troops in Afghanistan faces new threat from Iran’, well I have a Potential Solution to this, – it is a bit farfetched and has some EXTREME literal Interpretation but I think it might work.

It angers me that most of the news is about Credit Crunch, Climate Change or War on Terror. I have had my one thing I wanted to do put on Hold for Five Years because of Al Qaeda, and until this trip went ahead, I was not able to plan anything else with this young man because more could go wrong and it would be harder to put right. unless London went reasonably well, which it did. If people just ignored Terrorist, life would be Easy. We Ignored the IRA, So why could we not ignore Al Qaeda, this was especially annoying as they were

Extremely unlikely to bomb on a Saturday.

Only likely to Bomb London, Birmingham and Manchester – Not Exeter – it’s too far west and would not inconvenience enough people. I have not heard of any extremist living in Exeter, but have Bristol, Manchester, Luton, and London.

If London was Allowed to Happen, We would have been out of the Al Qaeda’s Territory, (Being London, Birmingham, Manchester) This One Trip Not Taking Place has put my whole life on hold for 5 years, I am more than happy to have an Extra Remembrance Day on July the 7th if People so want it, but let’s just focus on those of us who a left for the other 363 days of the year.

I promise that I will stop my Literalism Campaign once six things have happened

• The End of hearing or reading about ‘The Credit Crunch’, ‘Climate Change’ or ‘War on Terror’ in the Media,
• Railway Routes Reopened (Domestic Routes) before High Speed Comes,
• Railway Fares Charged in Four or Five Price Bands – All of which are SUBJECT TO TIME and NOT Subject to Availability – If all Reservable on Advanced Band 4 Seats are Gone, then All Reservable Seats are Gone on Advanced Band 4. Please See Trains Blog,
• Cheaper to travel one way on Advances Tickets One Way than to Travel Both ways on an Open Ticket.
• Railway Travel Cheaper than Air Travel,
• Olney has a Bus Departing Every Hour for Milton Keynes – Same time(s) each hour,
• Security Announcements about suspicious items include the Word ‘Lost’,
• Train Operators to use the Heightened State of Security to Benefit Passengers. I believe the only train operators who are using the increased threat to the advantage of Both Passengers and them selves, are East Midlands Trains and Trans Pennine Express.

I have PowerPoint Presentations on a Variety of Topics, including one which includes my take on the Security Situation, which I could send you at your request.

Below is What was in the Attachments

The Plan

A pair of I E Ds will explode in London before the end of May,

• One in North Greenwich

• The other in Trafalgar Square

Then a video will be made show how people could not be bothered when two bombs exploded right by them.

Transport will be filmed and will show that it has not been affected by the explosions of the Literalist Bombs. Made from a fizzy drink and some sweets, and with the total number of Death and Injures totalling 0, they will be declared ‘Real’ emphasising the 0 Deaths and Injuries, including No Unwanted Damage to Property and no fear at the point of the devices being let off.

The Literalist will hold it as high as possible then let it go, then say a Bomb has gone off, because if you look at the situation literally, one will have gone off. The Theory behind this will be “How can you be showing love to your neighbour if you are trying to blow them up.” If everything goes to plan the total number of Deaths and Injuries will be Zero.

The Ingredients will be Coca Cola and XXX Strong Mints, THE philosophy of this plan is ‘Anything which is intended to ‘Kill’, ‘Injure’, ‘Frighten’ or ‘Upset’ is Declared ‘Fake’ by order of Common Sense’.

This would only work if we Great Britain abide by it ourselves, then we can enforce it upon Iran and other places.

Likewise If someone goes into shop with a weapon to steal, the same tactic is employed, telling the aggressor that you have a bomb and it will detonate in 2 minutes.

Once everyone is outside to whole crowd accept one person should be apologised to using the line

“To most of you I apologise for the inconvenience you have been caused and thank you for your co–operation with me in this matter, there is someone among us who has made a ‘Knife’ ‘Fake’ Capital F size 32 in bold and underlined and in red with the ‘a’ ‘k’ ‘e’ in Black, Size 12 Regular and NOT Underlined.

The Key Question here is “How can you be showing love to your Neighbour if you are trying to threaten them to get what you want?” and the answer is “You can’t and it is that simple”. If the aggressor now wishes to harm the person with the bomb, the aggressor’s weapon becomes Double ‘Fake’. The Bomb remains ‘Real’ as it was intended for the greater Good) beyond the intension to frighten One person)

Any person who wishes to have nothing to do with bombs Must do All of the following three things

1. Never be in control of any vehicle that has inflatable tyres

2. Only drink Ales, Beers, Ciders and lagers that are on sale in a pub or club that are on draught.

3. Never work in supermarket or Off Licence.

Any Person who wants a REAL Bomb should go to a Toy Shop, in the first instance, I bought mine from John Lewis – it says ‘Bomb’ on the box therefore it is a Bomb, Consumer Protection Laws take Priority over Anti Terror Laws.

One final Note: I have already caused an explosion at MK Theatre with a bottle of Sparkling Water – just before a show, when in with everybody else, and came out with everybody else at the End of it – the bottle – I dropped it. When I worked in a Supermarket, One thing I used to fear more than an explosion was a breakage. If a Can exploded, just too bad, removing the exploded item was often the end of the issue. With a bottle Breakage, the broken glass would make it more difficult to clear up as you usually get small fragments of glass, the bigger ones not being as much problem, because they can be seen immediately and are careful when picking them up – it is always the smallest of fragments that cause the injury if there is one.

Contents of Second Attachment – Formulated in Excel

==============[] Walk On []=ADV 1 [] =ADV 2[] =ADV 3 [] ADV 4

============= []Departure[] 4 Days []10 Days[] 2 Weeks[] 3 Weeks

Standard Anytime Rtn [] = =£234 [] = £211 [] =£176 [] ==£177 [] £060

Standard Anytime Sng [] = =£130 [] = £117 [] =£098 [] ==£065 [] £033

Standard Off Peak Rtn [] = =£117 [] = £107 [] =£089 [] ==£060 [] £029

Standard Off Peak Sng [] = =£069 [] = £059 [] =£049 [] ==£033 [] £016

==Super Off Peak Rtn [] = =£081 [] = £074 [] =£062 [] ==£042 [] £020

==Super Off Peak Sng [] = =£045 [] = £041 [] =£034 [] ==£023 [] £011

This Way, it would be cheaper to travel one way on an advanced ticket for those that can, making rail fares fairer to those who are not displaying that Lovely Autistic Trait of Being Unhappy to Compromise. There would be a 10% discount for buting both tickets outward and return portions together. Periods of Time are only assumed and would need careful consideration.

Attachment Contents End

Thank you for your time

I look forward to reading your Comments

(Most Roverstart) Anthony S Tull

Media Coverage & Young People

Personally I believe that we as a nation need to STOP, THINK, REFLECT, I Archbeship of Mathematics & Logic have NOW declared that it is time to FOCUS on THE POSITIVE THINGS

That our Young People do.

Yes, I know that there a few children and teenagers that are horrid but that is the VAST MINORITY, there are far MORE things done children and Young People that are GOOD Deeds.

It seems that a lot of the GOOD things done by youngsters stay out of the media, while horrid people (the MINORITY) are the ones that get mentioned by the Media. There a lot of Adults who are scared of children and Teenagers and even some Teenagers that are scared of teenagers (Paedophobic and Ephebiphobic). I intend to Change That, with or without the Co—operation of Others.

Some of The Teenagers That Deserve for the CORRECT REASONS and SHOULD be in the Media were the Under 14 Olney Town Football Team Players who were in the Co—operative Store on the Morning Saturday 13th February Bag Packing, Raising funds for their tour to Wales. This was something they wanted to do and as far as I could tell they enjoyed it too. Some of them can now say “Aberystwyth” I was working that day serving on a Main Till and I also enjoyed it. It was good working with the youngsters as an Equal to them. It showed the Positives that Young People have and can share.

The Prejudicial things, like some of them wear there trousers around their bottoms rather than the waists, are put on a “back seat” or “off the bus totally”. It doesn’t matter how much people like or dislike these silly characteristics as the most important thing is that we have a Positive Attitude toward Young People and the Young People have a positive attitude towards what they were doing — something that quite a large number the Older People Appreciate. During this Short 3 hour 30 minute Period the Club raised £350.

On Thursday 18th Feb there were two Children who were awarded by the Ambulance Service for their Bravery and Quick Thinking for the numerous occasions when the Mother has had a Epileptic Seizure. These children were aged 7 and 10 years old. The Young Lady who found my phone is Further Proof that you do get Nice People and Some of those are children or teenagers. It would have been nice to have met the young person as she was the one who found my phone and then I could have said “Thank you” to Franky in Person but obviously have to take into account certain other factors, shyness being one of the possibilities.

Thank you to Franky for your hard work in getting my phone back to me, I realise that you needed to make quite a few calls to get hold of someone before you could let them know that you had my phone. Many Thanks, Much appreciated, Anthony.

In all these cases, I can see the Commandment [Love your neighbour as yourself] being carried out, by young people. Lets make that Song and dance about these events and then people will realise that Children and teenagers DO have Good Traits. The Small minority will realise that they are not getting attention so hopefully will be good.

I look forward to Reading your (Other People) Comments

Common Sence Ruling by Judge

Thursday 21st January the Times Newspaper reported a [COMMON SENSE] victory for the man who defended his house. Jack Straw says there is no need for New legislation, the Conservation would change the rules to promise greater protection for those who intervene to stop criminals. I think both the Labour AND Conservative Parties are correct as for it would not making new legislation but simply Changing EXISTING legislation.

Commandment Number 8 says [YOU MUST NOT STEAL]. People usually only break in to another person's house to Steal. The Burglar as far as I am concerned got what he deserved. Okay, so we let people take the Law into their own hands, then Civilised Society would collapse. If you knowingly commit {Trespass} then you must do so at your own risk. Breaking in Entry to someone Else's property without a Good Reason must surely carry the same consequences. When Tony Martin shot a burglar, the burglar was old enough to know the difference between right and wrong so therefore had it coming. Personally I would prefer to have only scared him, possibly still by using the gun especially if I was in Mr Martin's Position and wanted to defend my Crops or Animals.

I will acknowledge at this point that I could have all the correct intentions e.g., to only scare the burglar rather than kill, (Commandment Number 6) but things could still go wrong. I could think he going to go the right so therefore shoot to the left for instance, but I only have a 67% chance that he lives unhurt. There is a 33% chance that he moves to the right, a 33% chance that he moves to the Left as well as a 34% chance that he maintains a straight line. In total, I have a 67% that the boy lives and remains unhurt. I would act on the 67% rather than the 33%. I would suggest that Mr Martin, most likely did the same as I would have done.

On a walk between Hemel Hempstead and St Albans I saw a sign mentioning the risk of being shot, particularly at dusk. The sign also mentioned High Visibility Garments. I can not remember the exact Contents of what the sign said, but if I do the walk again will report on it, assuming I see the same sign again

Safe Road Behaviour Vs Hearing Safety Equipment

If any one has seen what goes on London, it is mostly those who are wearing Helmets that are going to get hit as they do not abide by the other rules. Riders who wear helmets think that because they can not hurt their head, they can ride how they like, where as riders who do not a helmet, have to be aware that they can hurt their head and so have to ride with consideration for others.

Also a Helmet will not stop the damage or suffering to the bike, the other vehicle or the other Person. Later on, you will meet Robert, who gets Made Incontinent by George, You will also hear about a few other people.
ALL NAMES in the story are FICTIONAL

I went down a hill at High Speed on two occasions, Once with wearing a Helmet, and once not. On the occasion I was wearing one I was, I thought I was going to Fall off the back and when it came to stopping, I did not think I was going to Stop in Time. (I put this down to the extra weight going forward,) so put my feet down locked them under the pedals and then stopped Far Too Early and Nearly Got Hit by the car behind and then had to ride a good couple of Car lengths. On the occasion when I was not wearing a helmet, I could feel the wind in my hair and did not have to counter any feeling like going to fall of the back of my bike so I had a much better Idea of how fast I was travelling. When It came to stopping, I stopped using only my brakes and feet were down once I got nearer to the Give Way Line ready for that possible stop if I was going to need to do so. I did actually stop and at the exact point I wished and the Car driver rolled to a stop behind me.

Something About Cycle Helmets – The BLUE Story. The RED I have decided to NOT Publish as the blue Story better portrays Forgiveness.

Characters

Robert	12 Year Old Boy Who Stands Behind Bus (Hansom According to Anne)	George	12 Year Old Cyclist & Robert’s Classmate
Anne	Robert’s Mother	Simon	George’s Best friend (Also 12 Years Old)
Michael	Roberts Father	Susan	George’s Mother
Jane	Robert’s 15 year old Sister (Pretty According to Anne)	Peter	George’s Father
Andrew	Jane’s Friend’s Brother

Robert and George enjoy working with each other in class, but don’t really spend much time together outside of the classroom due to different interests. Their relationship was a mutual one. George hates wearing a cycle helmet as he finds them very uncomfortable, he has had accidents both when wearing a helmet and also when not, and has not sustained anything more serious than a headache. He has had more near misses when wearing a helmet and he takes more risks to speed up his journey as it is that uncomfortable. George’s best friend, Simon, says “he is safer not wearing one due to his behaviour when he is wearing one”. Susan says “he must wear one”, while his Peter “He Alone should decide whether or not to wear one and MUST know both sides of the argument.”

Usually at this junction George slows down to about 12 miles per hour so that he has time to manage the risks properly (vehicles pulling out, pedestrians crossing on his green and people standing behind the bus) and the wind is stronger here then anywhere else on his journey. On this occasion it was a really hot day and the helmet was REALLY uncomfortable so he was sprinting to get home so that he could take his helmet off as soon as possible, he achieved 22 miles per hour. As he attempted to take the bend the wind caught him slightly off guard and sent him into the Filter Lane for Car Park and Bus Stop. As he attempted to get back into the main lane, he found that the wind was too strong and he was not able to move far enough over to avoid hitting the back of the bus. He also did not have enough time to stop. Robert was standing at the offside corner – oops

BANG

Robert was rushed to Hospital with a severe head injury, George also went for a check up. George got away with only a headache which lasted a couple of hours and therefore he was then sent home. Robert however never [fully] recovered, and [he was left incontinent].

George knew that he had hurt Robert, and something bad had happened. He also knew that Robert’s sister Jane blamed him for it. However he did not have the confidence to apologise to [Robert]. He asked his [Peter & Susan] if one of them go around to Robert’s house with him to apologise, find out what had happened and if Jane was telling the truth, and to explain his side of the story. [Susan and George] went round to Robert’s house to do those things. [Robert was] happy with the explanation and so were Anne and Michael. They forgave George, however Jane didn’t, she sought to get revenge on George and asked her friend’s brother, Andrew to scare and hurt George. [Robert was] unhappy about this and told Jane to apologise to George, she didn’t so she was not picked up when she missed the bus one night and had to wait for the next bus which in two hours time. Then she apologised to George [and Robert] and [they both] forgave her.

They all lived happy ever after.

If these bods are so convinced that {Helmets Save Lives} then why not start Introducing them for Pedestrians too. I could just as easily Slip or trip while walking to bus stop and hurt my head. In Lanzarote I lost balance due to a strong Wave but hurts my Hands and One Knee - This occasion I was in the sea - WITH NO BIKE.

When is the police AND Government going to tell THE NATION THE TRUTH about ALL Safety devises. Seatbelts have Killed a few people - Granted they have saved more lives and they have lost but People Should make up their own minds.